Donald Trump or Kamala Harris?

As the United States approaches yet another pivotal election, voters are carefully weighing their options, considering policy priorities, leadership qualities, and long-term vision. For many, the choice between President Donald Trump and Kamala Harris does not necessarily represent the best of what the U.S. has to offer. Yet, for better or worse, these are the two candidates from whom the American electorate must choose this November.

President Donald J. Trump emerges as the more viable option for many. His distinctive combination of political resilience, economic achievements, and staunch commitment to American values offers a clear and determined path forward for the country.

Under Trump’s leadership, the U.S. witnessed one of its strongest economies in decades. Prior to the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, unemployment reached historic lows, with record-breaking figures for African Americans, Hispanics, and women. The stock market surged to unprecedented heights, boosting retirement accounts and generating wealth for millions of Americans. Trump’s tax cuts and deregulation policies were instrumental in creating an environment where businesses, both large corporations and small enterprises, could flourish.

By slashing bureaucratic red tape, reducing corporate taxes, and bringing manufacturing jobs back to the U.S., Trump made it easier for American businesses to expand. His emphasis on fair trade agreements, such as transforming NAFTA into the USMCA (United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement), ensured that American workers were no longer at a disadvantage on the global stage.

One of Trump’s core promises has been to prioritise America’s security and military strength. He succeeded in increasing defence spending, ensuring the U.S. military remained the most powerful force in the world. His administration made strides in modernising the military and improving conditions for veterans by expanding healthcare options, enhancing benefits, and establishing job training programmes.

Trump’s foreign policy followed the “America First” doctrine, pulling out of costly international agreements that did not serve U.S. interests and instead using economic leverage to maintain peace, often eschewing military intervention. His bold approach to diplomacy—whether engaging directly with North Korea, applying pressure on Iran, or holding NATO allies accountable for their defence commitments—was a key feature of his presidency.

During a time of heightened national tension, Trump has been a consistent advocate for law and order. He has supported local police forces and underscored the importance of maintaining safe communities, standing firmly against efforts to defund or weaken law enforcement. While other politicians may appear hesitant, Trump’s unapologetic stance on public safety resonates strongly with those concerned about rising crime and civil unrest in urban centres. His administration’s aggressive actions against gangs, drug cartels, and human trafficking have yielded significant results in curbing violence and safeguarding vulnerable communities.

Perhaps one of the most enduring aspects of Trump’s presidency is his influence on the judiciary. He made this a central focus of his tenure, appointing over 200 conservative federal judges, including three Supreme Court Justices: Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett. These appointments have cemented a judiciary likely to uphold constitutional values and individual liberties for generations to come.

For many Americans concerned with issues such as religious freedom, the Second Amendment, and limiting government overreach, Trump’s judicial appointments are seen as vital to protecting these principles.

His tough stance on immigration has been another defining feature of his presidency. His administration took concrete steps to secure the U.S. border, including the construction of hundreds of miles of new border wall and implementing stricter enforcement policies to deter illegal immigration. By focusing on prioritising American workers, Trump argued that unchecked immigration suppresses wages and strains public resources. His administration also sought to reform the immigration system, advocating for an end to chain migration and the visa lottery, while promoting merit-based immigration to serve the nation’s long-term economic interests.

Despite relentless opposition from media outlets, political adversaries, and even members of his own party, Trump has shown an unwavering ability to pursue his agenda. His resilience, whether during impeachment proceedings or managing the COVID-19 pandemic, highlights his capacity to handle the immense pressures of the presidency. For many voters, this strength of character is precisely what is needed to steer the U.S. through future challenges.

Throughout his presidency, Trump has been a staunch defender of traditional American values, championing religious freedom, the right to bear arms, and the importance of the nuclear family. His policies reflect a deep belief in American exceptionalism and the conviction that the U.S. should lead by example, both economically and morally. For many who feel these values are under attack, Trump represents the last line of defence against what they perceive as a drift towards socialism, cancel culture, and increased government control.

In a time of great political polarisation, Donald Trump offers a clear choice for voters who prioritise economic freedom, national security, law and order, and the preservation of traditional values. His proven record on economic success, military strength, and unyielding leadership makes him a compelling candidate. As voters head to the polls, they will face two contrasting visions for America’s future, and for many, Trump’s vision aligns with their hopes for a stronger, safer, and more prosperous nation.

On the other hand, Kamala Harris, while a prominent figure in U.S. politics, raises concerns for many voters regarding her suitability as a national leader. One of the most significant criticisms of Harris is her shifting policy stances. Throughout her career, she has frequently altered her positions on key issues, which has led to questions about her core principles. As an illustration, in the 2020 Democratic primaries, Harris initially backed Medicare for All, a comprehensive healthcare plan run by the government, but later adjusted her position. This inconsistency has made it difficult for voters to fully understand her positions on critical issues such as healthcare, criminal justice reform, and immigration.

Harris’s shifting views raise concerns that her policy decisions may be driven more by political expediency than by a genuine vision for the nation’s future. As California’s Attorney General, Harris was involved in several controversial decisions, particularly concerning criminal justice. Progressives have criticised her tough-on-crime stance, noting that it disproportionately affected minority communities. Harris’s office fought to uphold wrongful convictions and resisted efforts to reform California’s criminal justice system, despite significant public demand for change.

While Harris has served as both a U.S. Senator and California’s Attorney General, her lack of executive leadership is seen by many as a potential drawback. In comparison to Trump, who had significant executive experience prior to his presidency, Harris’s ability to manage crises, respond to national security threats, or handle economic downturns remains unproven.

During the 2020 Democratic primary, Harris’s campaign failed to gain significant traction, and she withdrew before the first votes were cast. This inability to rally widespread support suggests that she may struggle to connect with the broader electorate in a general election.

Moreover, while Harris attempts to position herself as a moderate, her alignment with some of the more radical elements of the Democratic Party has raised concerns among centrists and independents. Her advocacy for policies like the Green New Deal, wealth redistribution, and stricter gun control measures could alienate middle-class and blue-collar voters concerned about job security and economic stability.

She has limited experience in foreign policy, an area where expertise is crucial given the complexities of international diplomacy, national security, and global economics. For voters seeking a candidate with a clear and decisive foreign policy record, this lack of experience could be a significant disadvantage.

While Kamala Harris has achieved success in her political career, her inconsistent positions, controversial record, and limited experience in executive leadership may raise concerns for voters seeking strong, decisive leadership in the White House. From her prosecutorial past to her alignment with more radical policies, Harris presents an uncertain prospect for many Americans. In a time of deep national crisis, voters may opt for a leader with clearer principles, more executive experience, and a stronger connection with the electorate.

With the approaching election, a significant portion of the mainstream media demonstrates a biased position against Donald Trump. For example, in a recent debate, ABC News moderators David Muir and Linsey Davis consistently challenged Trump’s claims, while offering less scrutiny of Kamala Harris’s assertions. In November, the American people will make a choice that will shape the nation’s—and the world’s—future. May that choice be the right one.

To see more articles related to this topic, follow this link.