The Disinformation Industry: A Growing Threat to Democracy

In an age where information travels faster than ever before, disinformation—the deliberate spread of false or misleading information—has emerged as a powerful tool, shaping public opinion, destabilising democracies, and fuelling social unrest. Governments, private entities, and even individuals have weaponised disinformation for financial gain, political influence, or to sow chaos. The disinformation industry, a global network of companies, hackers, influencers, and PR firms, is thriving, trading on the ability to manipulate public perception.

A year ago, The Guardian’s investigation into this shadowy world has shone a light on the dark underbelly of the internet. Their research reveals the scope of the problem, uncovering networks of fake accounts, bot armies, and disinformation campaigns that stretch from small interest groups to nation-state actors.

At its core, the disinformation industry is about manipulation. Social media platforms and online forums serve as battlegrounds where truth is twisted, opinions are forged, and narratives are controlled. What makes this industry so insidious is its sophisticated machinery.

The prestigious British paper’s investigation revealed that this disinformation industry is no longer confined to rogue states or fringe actors; it has become a multi-billion-pound global business. Companies specialising in disinformation campaigns, including those posing as legitimate public relations firms, offer their services to clients ranging from political parties to corporations seeking to undermine competitors.

One of the key revelations from the investigation is the extent to which disinformation can be outsourced. Rather than relying on state-controlled propaganda, governments or interest groups can hire firms to carry out disinformation campaigns with plausible deniability. These companies deploy disinformation with surgical precision, exploiting social media algorithms to flood the digital space with falsehoods while staying under the radar of platform moderators.

The investigation also highlighted specific case studies in which disinformation was deployed to devastating effect. In one case, corporations actively waged a smear campaign against environmental activists, while in another, a political party actively used these tactics to discredit opponents during an election cycle. The investigation also revealed the existence of “fake news factories” based in countries like the Philippines and Eastern Europe, where armies of content creators churn out clickbait articles and deceptive news stories designed to go viral.

The impacts of disinformation are profound and far-reaching. Politically, it has influenced elections, widened polarisation, and eroded trust in democratic institutions. But disinformation is not limited to politics.

Social unrest is often stoked by these disinformation campaigns. False reports and manipulated narratives create fear, confusion, and anger, which can erupt into violence. The disinformation industry thrives on exploiting vulnerabilities in society—whether economic, political, or cultural—fanning the flames of division.

One of the most striking revelations from The Guardian’s investigation into the disinformation industry involved a shadowy figure known as “Jorge”. This individual, who uses the alias “Jorge”, is at the centre of an intricate web of global disinformation campaigns and is reportedly a key player in orchestrating digital manipulation efforts across several countries. Jorge’s operations represent a particularly dangerous form of private-sector interference in the political and social landscapes of entire nations.

Who is Jorge? Jorge is the codename for an Israeli operative, though little is known about his true identity. His group, sometimes referred to as “Team Jorge”, offers clients around the world covert services that manipulate elections, sway political outcomes, and shape public opinion. This group reportedly includes former military personnel and intelligence operatives, many of whom come from Israel’s highly regarded cyber intelligence sector.

The Guardian’s investigation (in collaboration with Le Monde and Der Spiegel), uncovered details of how Jorge and his team utilise a complex arsenal of digital tools to spread disinformation. Their services are covertly marketed to clients, including governments, political parties, corporate entities, and individuals seeking to tarnish reputations or influence key events. Jorge operates from the shadows, offering high-level services that range from hacking and social media manipulation to more intricate psychological operations designed to sway public sentiment.

The investigation sheds light on the sophisticated tools at Jorge’s disposal. One of the most significant revelations involved the Advanced Impact Media Solutions (AIMS) software, a cutting-edge platform developed by Jorge’s team to run mass disinformation campaigns. AIMS allows Jorge’s clients to control a vast network of fake social media profiles across multiple platforms, including Facebook, X (formerly known as Twitter), and Instagram. These fake accounts appear highly credible, complete with intricate backstories and interactions, making them indistinguishable from real users.

Key techniques used by Jorge and his team include:

Fake Social Media Accounts and Bots

Jorge’s team creates large networks of fake social media profiles that mimic real people, often with detailed personal information, photos, and connections. These profiles are then used to infiltrate online communities, push disinformation, and manipulate conversations. According to *The Guardian*, the AIMS software can manage thousands of fake accounts at once, making it a powerful tool for digital influence.

Election Interference

One of Jorge’s most notorious specialities is manipulating elections in various countries. His team works in the shadows to boost or discredit candidates by spreading fake news, running smear campaigns, and even hacking opposition parties. Jorge claims to have influenced over 33 elections worldwide, with many of his operations taking place in Africa, South America, and Southeast Asia.

Digital Hacking

Beyond social media manipulation, Jorge’s team also offers hacking services. These include breaking into email accounts of political opponents, leaking sensitive information, or planting false evidence to damage reputations. The group’s hacking abilities allow them to alter the narrative in real-time, feeding manipulated data into the social media ecosystem to ensure the disinformation gains traction.

Psychological Operations

Unlike other disinformation firms that rely solely on bots or content farms, Jorge’s group engages in psychological warfare. They utilise a deep understanding of local politics and culture to create highly targeted campaigns that tap into existing societal divisions. By crafting disinformation that resonates emotionally with target populations, they can stoke unrest, division, and distrust in democratic institutions.

The revealed scale of Jorge’s operations, raises serious questions about the future of democracy. While disinformation campaigns are not new, the sophisticated methods used by Jorge’s team demonstrate the extent to which private actors can interfere in sovereign political processes. With disinformation tools that can be rented to the highest bidder, the integrity of elections, public discourse, and even personal reputations are at stake.

Some of the more unsettling aspects of Jorge’s work lie in its secrecy and the plausible deniability it offers to clients. Governments or corporations seeking to manipulate elections or sabotage opponents no longer need to rely on their own intelligence services. Instead, they can outsource the dirty work to covert actors like Jorge, whose operations fly under the radar. This lack of accountability allows dangerous precedents to be set, eroding public trust in institutions and making it difficult for authorities to combat the spread of disinformation.

Exposing Jorge and his team is just the beginning. While The Guardian’s investigation brought this operation to light, dismantling such sophisticated networks is no easy task. Jorge’s group, with its extensive resources and expertise in covert cyber operations, represents just one node in a much larger disinformation industry. Governments, tech companies, and civil society face significant challenges in shutting down these operations, especially given the anonymous, global nature of the internet.

The exposé on Jorge serves as a sobering reminder of the vast and dangerous capabilities of private disinformation actors. As the world grapples with the consequences of misinformation and polarisation, the activities of actors like Jorge demonstrate the urgent need for stronger regulatory frameworks, which do not mean censorship, transparency from social media platforms, and international cooperation. Without these measures, the manipulation of elections, public discourse, and even the fate of entire nations will continue to be for sale to the highest bidder.

The disinformation industry poses one of the greatest threats to truth in the modern era. Its ability to manipulate public opinion, destabilise democracies, and profit from misinformation makes it a powerful force that must be reckoned with. The investigation underscores the urgency of addressing this issue, revealing the scale and sophistication of the networks that perpetuate disinformation.

In this battle for truth, it is not enough to simply acknowledge the problem. Collective action, informed citizens, and responsible platforms will be key to dismantling the disinformation industry and protecting the foundations of democracy in an increasingly digital world.

Civil society must also be fully aware that this situation can’t be used as an excuse by governments and mainstream media to impose censorship. We should be educated enough to know what fake news is and what constitutes a different point of view—another perspective on a current issue. It is from this dilemma that the most dangerous consequences could emerge. Freedom of expression should not be the price to pay in combating fake news.

To see more articles related to this topic, follow this link.